Toyota believes the future is now with a major investment in Kentucky toward its Toyota New Global Architecture. 

Toyota is laying claim to automotive dominance in the South. The company’s $1.33 billion investment - the highest of any automaker in Kentucky and the second-largest in state history - will make Toyota Motor Manufacturing Kentucky Inc. (TMMK) the first plant in North America to begin producing vehicles using Toyota New Global Architecture (TNGA).

Named the "Most American Made" car by and the No. 1 selling car in America for the past 15 years, the Camry, from the 2018 model year, will become the first Toyota vehicle made in the United States to fully incorporate the new vehicle development and production technology. 

"This $1.33 billion investment is part of Toyota's plan to invest $10 billion dollars in the United States over the next five years, on top of the nearly $22 billion Toyota has invested in the U.S. over the past 60 years," says Jim Lentz, CEO of Toyota Motor North America. "Toyota New Global Architecture is about exciting, ever-better vehicles for our customers as it will improve performance of all models, including increased fuel efficiency, more responsive handling and a more stable, comfortable feel while driving."


The Greenbriar Companies has built more than half of all intermodal double-stack railcars in operation today, and it’s recent achievement underscores that dominance. 

The Greenbrier Companies Inc. hit a major milestone recently when it produced its 100,000th intermodal double-stack unit. This milestone achievement began more than 32 years ago at Greenbrier's flagship production and design facility, Gunderson LLC, based in Portland, Ore.

"Gunderson has been a pioneer in railcar design since Greenbrier's 1985 acquisition of this legendary manufacturing facility in operation since 1919,” says William A. Furman, chairman and CEO. “Building 100,000 intermodal double-stack units is a significant achievement for Greenbrier. It is the result of years of hard work and dedication provided by our American workforce at Gunderson, which includes many employees who have worked in this facility in Portland for multiple decades. Greenbrier's manufacturing history began with the intermodal double-stack railcar at Gunderson in 1985. Greenbrier is proud to build intermodal double-stack railcars in America – work that supports more than 1,000 highly-skilled jobs in Portland."  

Greenbrier spearheaded the design of double-stack railcars, which were introduced in North America in the mid-1980s to haul intermodal containers. Double-stack technology revolutionized long-distance freight transportation by railroads. Using double-stack technology, a freight train of a given length can carry roughly twice as many containers, sharply reducing costs per container. These cars are used for nearly 70 percent of all U.S. intermodal shipments.

"This is a rewarding milestone for Greenbrier and the hard-working team here at Gunderson," says Mark Eitzen, senior vice president and general manager at Gunderson. "I am proud of all our team members and appreciate the continued support of our suppliers and customers. We are also pleased to regularly receive quality awards for our intermodal railcars from our leading customer, TTX Company, a top provider of railcars to the North American rail industry. Our success is linked to the railroad industry's goal to realize substantial financial and environmental savings – our 100,000 intermodal double stack railcars save 15.5 billion truck miles each year resulting in lower emissions and reduced road traffic."

Greenbrier produces nearly twice the number of intermodal double stack railcars than its closest competitor and has built approximately 50 percent of all intermodal double-stack railcars operating globally. Greenbrier has evolved and innovated from a railcar builder with a single product offering to a global manufacturer that now provides numerous railcar products and aftermarket solutions to support the transportation needs of thousands of customers, today on four continents.

 "We are fortunate to have employers like Gunderson in our City," says Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler . "I congratulate all at Gunderson and Greenbrier on the production of their 100,000th intermodal double stack unit and I look forward to their continued success."


New Hampshire is attracting manufacturers with all it has to offer in terms of a quality business climate, strong workforce and geographic excellence. By Staci Davidson

New Hampshire may be primarily known for its beautiful scenery and being first chair during the presidential primary races, but it’s quite the hot spot for manufacturing, as well. Some of the country’s first textile mills were established along the Merrimac River in New Hampshire, and manufacturing continues to be the backbone of the state’s economy, employing 70,000 people or 13 percent of the private sector workforce, according to Jeff Rose, commissioner of the state’s Department of Resources and Economic Development.

“It’s a unique state and a fantastic state for manufacturing,” Rose says. “New Hampshire always has had a rich tradition in manufacturing and it’s adapted in a fluid fashion to reflect modern manufacturing. The old skeletons of the state’s old mill buildings are now home to the most high-tech companies and universities.”

Rose explains New Hampshire has three distinct advantages for manufacturers:

* The Granite State’s world-class workforce and talent, as the result of its high high-school graduation rate and high attainment rates of education after high school.

* The business-friendly environment that stems from the low costs of doing business and easy access to decision makers.

* The first-rate quality of life.

“People who live here stay here,” Rose says. “New Hampshire has amazing diversity in close proximity. We are close to Boston and the ocean’s coastline, but we also have a great lakes region, amazing rivers and the White Mountains. All of the best things about New England are here.”


The Rise Of The Bimodal Supply Chain

By Elliot Jay

Supply chains in the 21st century are faced with a wide range of complex issues. There has been an increase in risk levels, with data from supply chain intelligence provider Resilinc showing a 118 percent increase in disruptive supply chain events from 2014 to 2015. Meanwhile, companies are also having to meet the needs of evermore demanding consumers, with 24-hour delivery now expected.

In order to meet these challenges, supply chains must be faster and more responsive if they are to retain a competitive edge. However, many organizations’ supply chain technologies and processes are simply not capable of supporting the necessary level of risk and response management to operate in this world, and the gap between what the supply chain provides and the requirements of the enterprise is only widening. Even companies traditionally held up as shining examples of best practise like Dell and McDonald’s are having to radically update their supply chain processes to remain viable. It is no longer enough to be efficient, they need to innovate too, integrating disruptive technologies such as Internet of Things (IoT) and artificial intelligence to avoid being left behind.

In order to achieve this, companies are beginning to embrace the concept of “bimodal supply chains.” The idea of bimodal supply chain has been pushed heavily by Gartner in particular as a solution that meets the needs of supply chains in today’s world. David Willis, chief of research at Gartner, summarized the reasoning behind the theory, noting: “For decades, supply chain professionals have been rewarded for focusing on being operationally excellent, risk-averse and trained through continuous improvement techniques. However, that approach is evolving to include strategic thinking, change leadership and sophisticated finance and communications skills. It is crucial to be open to leveraging the wisdom of crowds and looking outside the company – and even outside the industry – for new ideas, and to bring those lessons back in practical ways. Learning how to explore through new means will drive bimodal adoption.”



As the manufacturing environment evolves, executives must evaluate and consider all costs, including workers' compensation insurance.

By John Rosmalen

For the last 11 years, manufacturing in the United States has been slowly moving toward a path to recovery. Based on U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, it can be viewed as a rebirth, albeit a gradual one. As the restoration of American manufacturing brings more jobs to the labor force, manufacturers will face a plethora of financial considerations to address including various laws and regulations, none the least of which is workers’ compensation insurance.

To understand the current milieu, here is a brief historical perspective on the evolving manufacturing environment and the challenges that will come with it. In the first decade of this century, American businesses were establishing partnerships with China to bring goods to the United States. Production costs were significantly below manufacturing expenses in the United States and chief financial officers focused more on risk management since there was no reason to be concerned about workers’ compensation costs and compliance. Then came the global financial crisis, which brought all of these problems to the forefront—poor product quality, safety issues, copyright and information theft.


The Future of the Manufacturing Skills Gap

By Jeremy G. Rice

The skills gap continues to challenge U.S. manufacturers as they seek to replace an aging workforce, implement new manufacturing technologies, and expand their businesses.  With society’s unfavorable perception of manufacturing careers and a nationwide focus on the traditional four-year college education, the skillsets of today’s workforce do not match up well with the hiring needs of manufacturing companies.

The skills gap is a complex issue with many causes and many solutions.  From 1979 to 2015, manufacturing jobs in the U.S. declined from 19.5 million to 12.3 million.  When taking the overall workforce growth over this period into account, the decline is even more dramatic.  Over 6 million of these jobs were lost due to the offshoring of manufacturing operations.  During that same time, national attention grew in focus on the importance of a four-year degree.  Parents, teachers, and guidance counselors pointed students away from careers in manufacturing and towards a college-educated career path.  As fewer and fewer people entered the industry, the existing skilled manufacturing workforce aged, leading to the widening skills gap that has become well known today. 


A new program will help manufacturers benefit from in-depth planning and tailored business solutions. 

Almost all manufacturing firms can use some kind of help, expecially if they are working to onshore their operations or begin exporting. Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, an accounting and advisory firm, is launching a new initative to be of assistance in those areas.

In February, Baker Tilly formed the Center for the Return of Manufacturing (CFRM) – a resource to help U.S.-based middle market manufacturing companies execute their strategies by initiating or returning operations to the United States and unlocking export and revenue growth opportunities abroad. The CFRM will provide similar services to companies located abroad and for those with an interest in launching manufacturing operations in the United States.

“The United States manufacturing sector has undergone significant and fundamental changes in recent years, particularly in traditionally heavy manufacturing states,” says Jeff Jorge, CFRM leader. “We created the CFRM for our clients and those manufacturers who have been looking for advice and guidance to help manage those changes as well as those we expect to come.”

The CFRM is a community of influence and experience, providing the knowledge, proven processes and proprietary methods for successfully assisting with a range of manufacturing-related issues. Those issues include reshoring, global manufacturing, site selection, project financing, domestic and international tax, import/export and supply chain and technology services in addition to ongoing industry insight and tax reform updates.

“The CFRM will play an important role in the future of U.S. manufacturing by offering tools and hands-on support to manufacturers. We emphasize balance in our approach to help companies analyze, understand and confidently execute the favorable business case for reshoring, relocating, growing and optimizing operations in the U.S,” Jorge adds.

The CFRM community includes the knowledge and insight of hundreds of Baker Tilly professionals and is led by Jorge who also leads the firm’s international growth services practice and the Latin America service desk.

“We represent a great number of manufacturing firms and we are preparing them for anticipated changes in tax and trade policy,” Partner and Baker Tilly Manufacturing Industry Leader Brad DeNoyer says. “Baker Tilly’s depth and breadth of manufacturing experience positions the CFRM to play a uniquely important role in helping U.S. manufacturers achieve their goals in a complex and ever-changing global marketplace.”

“The global landscape for manufacturers is changing,” Jorge says. “They need foresight, advice, advocacy and resources and the CFRM is very well positioned to help those companies navigate the new future in manufacturing and product demand – both in the U.S. and abroad.”



EPA Issues Final TSCA Reporting Rule for Nanoscale Materials

By Lynn L. Bergeson

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued on Jan. 12, 2017, a final rule under Section 8(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) establishing reporting and recordkeeping requirements for certain discrete forms of chemical substances that are manufactured or processed at the nanoscale. This column summarizes the rule.

Reportable Chemical Substances

The final rule applies to chemical substances that are solids at 25 ºC and standard atmospheric pressure; that are manufactured or processed in a form where any particles, including aggregates and agglomerates, are in the size range of 1-100 nanometers (nm) in at least one dimension; and that are manufactured or processed to exhibit one or more unique and novel properties. The rule does not apply to chemical substances manufactured or processed in forms that contain less than one percent by weight of any particles including aggregates and agglomerates in the size range of 1-100 nm.

The rule defines unique and novel properties as “any size-dependent properties that vary from those associated with other forms or sizes of the same chemical substance, and such properties are a reason that the chemical substance is manufactured or processed in that form or size.”  Under the final rule, a reportable chemical substance is not just a substance containing particles in the size range of 1-100 nm, “it must also demonstrate a size-dependent property different from properties at sizes greater than 100 nm and is a reason the chemical is manufactured or processed in that form or size.”

Corporate Head Office

Manufacturing Today Magazine
Cringleford Business Center
Intwood Road, Norwich, UK,

  +44 (0) 1603 274 130

Click here for a full list of contacts.

North American Office

Manufacturing Today Magazine
Finelight Media
207 E. Ohio Street Suite 351
Chicago, IL 60611

Click here for a full list of contacts.

Finelight Media


"The article Manufacturing Today wrote about us was spot-on. It was a pleasure working with them from interview to published article and everything was as promised.” – Jennifer Brozek, inside sales, Koyo Machinery USA Inc.

Click here for more testimonials.

Choose DuPage

Back To Top