The EU and US Challenge China’s Overcapacity in Electric Vehicles and Solar
China, long known as ‘the world’s factory,’ has rapidly evolved from a producer of low-end goods to a global leader in green technology, particularly in electric vehicles (EVs), solar panels, and lithium batteries. This shift, however, is causing alarm in both the European Union and the US due to China’s significant ‘industrial overcapacity’. Despite China’s defense of its policies, Western nations are grappling with the repercussions of an oversupply that disrupts global markets, often at the expense of local industries.
Understanding China’s Overcapacity Problem
China’s industrial overcapacity is largely driven by substantial government subsidies, which fuel excessive production in green sectors like EVs and solar panels. These subsidies, combined with incentives like low-cost loans and cheap land access, result in supply far outpacing domestic demand. For example, China controls around 60% of global EV production, 80% of solar panel production, and over 70% of lithium battery production. However, since domestic consumption is unable to absorb this production, the surplus is exported at highly competitive prices, which undercuts local manufacturers in the EU and the US.
This strategy is not new for China. By leveraging state-backed support, Chinese manufacturers flood global markets with lower-priced goods, often disrupting industries in other countries. In the green technology sectors, these cheap exports have sparked growing concerns in the West, where local manufacturers are struggling to compete. China’s dominance in green industries is not only transforming global trade but also raising questions about how Western economies can protect their industries.
How China’s Subsidies Distort Global Competition
China’s extensive state subsidies have distorted global competition, particularly in the EV sector. These subsidies—amounting to $230 billion over the past decade—allow Chinese companies to produce EVs and solar panels at significantly lower costs than their Western counterparts. For example, an EV in China can cost half as much as one sold in Europe, largely due to government backing.
The effects of these subsidies are felt across the global market. The US and EU have reacted by imposing tariffs and launching investigations into Chinese subsidies, aiming to shield their domestic industries. However, these measures have only intensified trade tensions. China, benefiting from an unfair competitive advantage, continues to dominate the global green industry. This leaves Western manufacturers at a significant disadvantage, despite attempts to protect their market share through tariffs and sanctions.
Tariffs, Sanctions, and Strategic Moves
The EU and the US have responded to China’s overcapacity with tariffs and trade restrictions, particularly targeting the EV market. In 2023, the EU imposed anti-dumping tariffs on Chinese EV imports to prevent these cheaper vehicles from overwhelming local manufacturers. Similarly, the US has introduced tariffs and tax incentives to support domestic industries while reducing dependence on Chinese imports.
China has retaliated with its own countermeasures, including anti-dumping investigations into key European and North American products. These trade disputes have only deepened the already strained geopolitical relations between China and the West. Both the EU and the US have ramped up their own industrial policies through initiatives like the US Inflation Reduction Act and the European Green Deal, which provide subsidies to green industries. However, these efforts, while protective, could escalate trade tensions further.
Will Chinese Overcapacity Continue?
The future of China’s overcapacity remains uncertain. One notable shift occurred when China ended subsidies for solar panels and EVs in 2022, which could reduce domestic production. However, this is likely to increase pressure on international markets as Chinese manufacturers seek new customers abroad.
At the same time, partnerships between Chinese and European manufacturers present potential loopholes. For instance, Chinese companies like XPeng Motors have formed collaborations with European automakers such as Volkswagen, allowing Chinese manufacturers to maintain a foothold in Europe despite tariffs.
As Western economies continue to adjust their industrial policies, they face the challenge of competing with China’s industrial strength without sparking a full-scale trade war. The EU and the US will likely continue to introduce protective measures while encouraging domestic production of green technologies. Still, China’s entrenched economic model and commitment to maintaining its global dominance suggest that overcapacity will continue to shape international markets for years to come.
Sources: